Re: is smarter bisect possible?
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz schrieb:
Show 13 quoted lines
> I have such problem. Linus kernel tree merged some feature
> (94e0fb086fc5663c38bbc0fe86d698be8314f82f) that was developed in .31rc9 era.
>
> Current Linus kernel tree with that feature merged shows some regression.
> Tree just before that merge doesn't show regression.
>
> Now if I start to bisect just that feature (good
> b7f21bb2e23b4fec16b448a34889f467465be659, bad
> 94e0fb086fc5663c38bbc0fe86d698be8314f82f) then git gets me whole tree back
> to .31rc9 era which... doesn't show any problems.
>
> This means that only combined current Linus tree and that feature shows a
> problem.
Try this:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#bisect-merges
-- Hannes