Re: [PATCH] git-remote: make remote name optional for prune operation
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- May 6, 2009, 16:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4A01B7A7.9020308@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <8c9a060905060846o1a7b26b0m78ff0cbe48648873@mail.gmail.com>
Jacob Helwig venit, vidit, dixit 06.05.2009 17:46:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 08:32, Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info> wrote: >> At 1241621365 time_t, Francis Galiegue wrote: >>> Didn't you forget a little something in your patch? >> >> If so, I really can't see what. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Julien Danjou > > I'm guessing, but perhaps Francis means a test for this behavior?
Documentation (besides changing <> to []), test. Also, it looks as if a get_one_entry() declaration is added without a definition. But the definition is there already.
Michael