Re: "git clone --depth <depth>" producing history with <depth + 1> commits?
- From
- Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@hartwork.org>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2009, 01:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <49D4128D.7000803@hartwork.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904020303320.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Anyone? Is "git clone --depth 1 <ropository>" really supposed to >> produce a history holding _two_ commits? Why so? > > Because storing _no_ commit (according to you, that should happen with > --depth=0) would make no sense? > > After all, if you want to clone, you want to clone at least _something_.
I'm aware you need one commit at least.
I didn't think of several branches before. I guess that's resolving the core of my question.
Sebastian