Re: git checkout -b origin/mybranch origin/mybranch
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2009, 14:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <49BA68D1.2070102@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <43d8ce650903120714g782b98e8t81340546547fe98d@mail.gmail.com>
John Tapsell venit, vidit, dixit 12.03.2009 15:14:
Show 15 quoted lines
> 2009/3/12 Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>: >> Heya, >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 14:18, John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is probably a mistake by the user. We should warn the user and point >>> them in the right direction. >> >> The point is that we _already_ warned the user (like Dscho pointed >> out), and that(as you pointed out), it didn't work :P. > > Just doing: > > git branch -b origin/master origin/master > > gives no error or warning at all.
...and it really should not. If you have a repo with lots of remotes and tracking branches, it makes a lot of sense to have a local branch reponame/branchname which tracks the remote branch reponame/branchname. Note that the first is refs/heads/reponame/branchname whereas the latter is refs/remotes/reponame/branchname. It gives warnings when it's ambiguous, yay.
Michael J Gruber