Re: Strange branch merging.
- From
- Adam Panayis <adam@movency.com>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2009, 12:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <49941D4C.80502@movency.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <FADBCA93-6742-43E8-A4A6-0090FBFF8BAB@frim.nl>
Pieter de Bie wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Hey, > > [ Please don't top-post here, it makes following the discussion harder ] > > On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Adam Panayis wrote: >> When I try to do that on box B I get the master branch from box A but >> I get the changes made to branch blah on box A. >> >> I do not understand why, on box B, the master branch is showing >> changes made to the blah branch on box A. (Yet on box A the changes >> to the blah branch are not shown in the master) > > You probably pulled in the 'blah' branch rather than the 'master' > branch because that was > the branch that is checked out on box A. You can verify this by > looking at 'git log' and > see that the commit on the blah branch is also there. To pull the > master branch, specify > it explicitly, like this: > > git pull boxA:path/to/repo master > > - Pieter
Pieter, thank you very much. Looks like that is indeed the mistake I was making.