Re: Short "git commit $file" syntax fails in the face of a resolved conflict
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Jan 22, 2009, 07:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4978202C.3090703@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <c1a864630901211346j4b702fb3tcc5a098ed7e1541d@mail.gmail.com>
Please don't top-post.
Nathan Yergler schrieb:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Can you elaborate on why doing -i automatically is a bad idea in this > case? [It may really be, I don't pretend to have enough knowledge > about git's internals to make a reasoned argument.] This was > unexpected behavior for me as I'd always experienced "git add path && > git commit" and "git commit path" as being equivalent and so I assumed > they would work equivalently in this situation.
They are not equivalent. 'git add path && git commit' commits changes to path *in addition* to what is already staged before you run this command sequence. But 'git commit path' commits *only* changes to path, leaving other changes that might be staged uncommitted.
It may become obvious why the latter behavior is unwanted if a merge is in progress: The merge left changes (and conflicts) in the index; but with 'git commit path' you say that you are not interested in what the index has.
-- Hannes