Re: more merge strategies : feature request
- From
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
- Date
- Dec 1, 2008, 09:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4933AC03.6050300@op5.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <81bfc67a0811290848m6cb219c0y71a7266001096f2d@mail.gmail.com>
Caleb Cushing wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> conflict: this strategy would always resolve in a merge conflict > allowing you to use git mergetool to piece the files back together. > > no-overwrite: if a change from the branch being merged in would > overwrite something in the current branch don't merge it. (I think it > needs a better name) >
If you could come up with use-cases where each would be useful, I think you'd have a much easier time to gain acceptance for your suggestions. Right now, you're saying "I want a red button" but you're not explaining what it's for.
-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231