Re: Rebasing Multiple branches at once...
- From
- Rick Moynihan <rick@calicojack.co.uk>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2008, 14:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <48F7542B.1050909@calicojack.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081016135908.GI536@genesis.frugalware.org>
Miklos Vajna wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Rick Moynihan <rick@calicojack.co.uk> wrote: >> I have a master branch, a dev branch and a number of feature branches from >> dev. And I was wondering if there was an easy way to rebase dev and all of >> it's sub-branches onto master. > > In general this is considered harmful. Why do you rebase your branch > from time to time? For example in git.git, topic branches are based on > master, then merged to master when they are ready, but they are never > rebased.
Yes, but my understanding is that it's only harmful if you publish the branch (or dependent branches) which are being rebased.
So rebasing is very bad in these circumstances, but I fail to see why it's bad if these branches are kept private.
R.