Re: Teach git status to do "git diff --name-status HEAD"

From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2008, 11:26 UTC
Message-ID: <48D0E960.1060402@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <m3ej3jm3ux.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 17.09.2008 13:04:

Show 22 quoted lines

> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
> 
>> Martin Langhoff venit, vidit, dixit 17.09.2008 08:40:
>>> I just did
>>>
>>> $ git checkout -b mdl19-offlinetony
>>> A       README.offline
>>> M       lib/javascript.php
>>>     (...)
>>> A       lib/offline/offlinemoodle.user.js
>>>
>>> I *like* this "brief status" style - takes me back to my cvs days :-).
>>> Perusing the source I found show_local_changes() which in turn led me
>>> to trying `git diff --name-status HEAD`. Now, including 'HEAD' in an
>>> alias defined in git config is going to lead to trouble... :-/
> [...]
>>> I might still make an alias to `git diff --name-status`. This would be
>>> a great thing to have as git status "--brief" IMHO... :-)
>> git status also shows untracked files. I don't know how to tell diff to
>> show untracked files as well. --diff-filter=X doesn't do it.
> 
> git-ls-files?

Yes, "git ls-files -t -d -m -o --directory" does something like "otherscmyouknowwho status". But it's plumbing, and the most obvious porcelain place for such functionality is "git status", followed by "git diff". I do understand that "git status" is mostly "git commit --dry-run". But shouldn't we have something like Martin suggested readily available (including, optionally, untracked or ignored files).

Michael