Merge only complete commits
- From
Ittay Dror <ittay.dror@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2008, 13:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <48BE96BA.1000106@gmail.com>
Hi,
Starting with '12345678', one branch creates a change '1A345678', the other '1B345C78'. Merging of the branches will result in '1<A=B>345C78'.
But isn't it logical to assume that if changes 'B' and 'C' were done in the same commit, then they are related and so a conflict in one implicitly means a conflict in the whole commit?
Of course, in a case of a single file, with a single commit, it is easy to detect. But what if there have been a history of commits before the merge, or if several files were changed?
Maybe help me find the commit by including them in the RCS conflict markers?
Ittay
-- -- Ittay Dror <ittay.dror@gmail.com>