Re: [RFC] Plumbing-only support for storing object metadata
- From
Marcus Griep <neoeinstein@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 18, 2008, 23:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <48AA0487.8050009@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080818230646.GA11044@cisco.com>
Derek Fawcus wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> My other hacky thought was that tag object could be overloaded for > this purpose. It is already sort of an indirect object, but seems > to be limited to appearing at the edge of the graph. > > If we could say have: > > commit -> tag -> tree > > then arbitrary data could be stored in the tag, similarly this > could be extended for when a tree or blob object is expected > (I'm not sure about the blob case).
I was under the impression that tags were references to commit objects, and they to tree objects:
tag -> commit -> tree
Also, wouldn't this require large numbers tags, or the ability to multi- target tags?
-- Marcus Griep GPG Key ID: 0x5E968152 —— http://www.boohaunt.net את.ψο´