Re: How do I stop git enumerating my working directory
- From
- Paul Gardiner <lists@glidos.net>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2008, 14:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <486B950F.2040801@glidos.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <c9e534200807011002q45ffca7bq8d91cd9b62335796@mail.gmail.com>
Glenn Griffin wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Paul Gardiner <lists@glidos.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a recent convert to git. I've been swapping over my projects >> from cvs to git. The latest candidate for conversion is the >> config files for my Linux server. I've been using cvs to record >> all the config changes, and - mostly-automatically - to setup >> new servers. Git will do a far better job, I think, but >> I think I'm going to run into a problem: the root directory >> of the server will be the working directory. Only relatively >> few files will be under version control. How do I stop git >> enumerating the whole drive whenever I do things like git-diff? > > I'm doing a similar thing in my home directory where the vast majority of files > are not being tracked, but only a select few are. I've found that git > automatically handles this case much better than other SCM's like subversion > because of it's concept of the index. Most of git's commands wont enumerate > your directory they will first read the index to see what files it's interested > in, and then do an lstat on those files to see which if any have changed. > git-diff in particular should do this to my knowledge. git-status is one of > the few commands that will actually enumerate your directory to tell you which > files are untracked, so long as you use status with care you will probably find > you don't need to do anything special or even setup > a .gitignore. > > Like I said, that's my experience your's may vary.
Brilliant! I've now tried it and it does just as you say. I don't need git-status so it's just fine. Thanks for the advice.
P.