Re: .git/info/attributes not cloned
- From
- Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@rea-group.com>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2008, 04:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <47EB271F.1050307@rea-group.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080327042925.GA6426@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:23:27PM +1100, Toby Corkindale wrote: > >> Ah, OK. >> I was hoping not to use .gitattributes, as then the attributes are >> ignored when doing something like: >> git archive --remote=example.com:/path/to/repo release/v2.1 | tar xf - > > I vaguely recall some discussion of this in the past, so maybe it isn't > a good idea. But I would think changing git-archive to respect > .gitattributes might be worth doing (presumably the version of > .gitattributes from the tree that is being exported).
Respecting the repo's .gitattributes would feel right. It seems unusual (to me) that it bypasses $REMOTE/.gitattributes, but DOES check $REMOTE/info/attributes.
Show 12 quoted lines
>> That gives a clue that the /info/ files are repo-specific.
>> However in gitignore(5) and gitattributes(5), there is no explanation of
>> this - it simply mentions that the info version is a higher priority than
>> the .git{ignore,attributes} version.
>>
>> I suggest that the individual docs/man-pages should mention that too.
>> I'll submit a patch in a separate email, as long as I'm not still
>> misunderstanding the mechanism.
>
> I think you understand what is going on. A clarification to both pages
> would be helpful, I think, just saying "here is why you might use one
> over the other."Cheers. I've submitted my patch now. I hope I have the doc syntax right.
Show 9 quoted lines
>> Is there a recommended way to make attributes apply to commands run on a >> remote repository, or is that a different bug? > > I'm not sure what you mean here. Very few commands talk to remote > repositories. I had assumed in your git-archive example that you wanted > .gitattributes on the remote repo to affect the tarfile generated by > that repo. But now it sounds like you want to edit a local file to > impact the archive generated remotely. I don't think there is a way to > do that.
Ah, no, you were right in your first assumption. I just wanted git-archive to apply gitattributes to the resulting tarball. (I should have phrased that last line as "..apply to commands connecting to a remote repo.." and it would make more sense.)
thanks, Toby