Re: [PATCH] Documentation: enhanced "git for CVS users" doc about shared repositories

Junio C Hamano ha scritto:

Honestly speaking, you've spent too much time in looking for every possible objections against these simple additions. At least it should be less than the time I've spent in measuring every single word of this patch, hoping you could consider them for inclusion. You gave me lot of attentions (I am grateful of this, really) so I should probably be surprised of the cleanliness of git code, of the rigor of the code style, of the clarity of the documentation. But unfortunately, I am not. I simply tried to make this document more useful and helpful for a wider audience of people that could ever consider of using git in their life. And yes, I decided to so because I had trouble myself during initial configurations. What's the problem if a document called "git for CVS users" is more explicated? What's the problem if it contains as many as possible informations to set up git in a viable way and, hopefully, to learn something on how it does work?

I'm sad. Not only because you refused a documentation patch, but because i could have sent a "Bug: Documentation Sucks!" to the ml and i would have obtained the same thing: nothing.

Francesco

P.S.:

You were right with usermod (groupadd is ok): that "-a" switch is redhat syntax. Six years of Linux Standard Base and this is still an unsolved problem...