git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Suggestion for mailing lists... split [PATCH]-es into own list

From
Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
Date
Oct 11, 2007, 18:00 UTC
Message-ID
<470E64C0.1070904@midwinter.com>
In-Reply-To
<e47324780710110857s472bf099u3e350d17a2c29f78@mail.gmail.com>
Thomas Harning Jr. wrote:
> Perhaps we should have a separate mailing list for patches vs discussion.
>

This list is somewhat unusual in that the two are not really distinct. Most of the discussion (or at least a huge percentage of it) is in response to patches or results in patches somewhere along the line, with updated versions of those patches intermingled with feedback. Having to bounce back and forth between two mailing lists for all that would seriously impair the flow of ideas / improvements here.

-Steve
Previous: Johannes SchindelinNext: Baz
Message 12 of 13 in “Suggestion for mailing lists... split [PATCH]-es into own list”
  1. Thomas Harning Jr.Oct 11, 2007
  2. Johannes SchindelinOct 11, 2007
  3. Is it possible for git to support binary differencing for binary files?银平, Oct 11, 2007
  4. Jean-Luc HerrenOct 11, 2007
  5. frankyOct 12, 2007
  6. Alex RiesenOct 11, 2007
  7. Martin LanghoffOct 12, 2007
  8. Simon SasburgOct 12, 2007
  9. Lars HjemliOct 12, 2007
  10. Simon SasburgOct 12, 2007
  11. Johannes SchindelinOct 12, 2007
  12. Steven GrimmOct 11, 2007
  13. BazOct 11, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.