Re: merging unmanaged working tree
- From
- Daniel <mjucde@o2.pl>
- Date
- Mar 15, 2010, 12:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a29168.6d880e7c.4b9e296c.483a1@o2.pl>
- In-Reply-To
- <87ljdtkedl.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl>
Show 16 quoted lines
> Hello. > > Is there a method to (dry?) run git-merge to detect conflicts > on: > > * current HEAD (or working tree) > * selected previous revision (the one used to "branch") > * directory tree (or a single file) "branched" with git-archive > > I'd like to synchronize portable working tree but don't want to keep > history in it. > > -- > Miłego dnia, > Łukasz Stelmach > --
Does "git-merge --squash" do what you want? You still need to have the other tree managed by git (even for a while).
-- Daniel