Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Generational repacking
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 7, 2007, 22:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90706071551w45592471g59a35abb871749bd@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <46687A73.6080100@vilain.net>
On 6/8/07, Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net> wrote:
> Ok. But if repack is generational you probably don't mind waiting for > it on commit so don't need to background it.
Agreed. The patch I posted back then was on fetch as a signle fetch is more likely to bring a lot of new objects in. (Moreso than a commit)
Repack-on-commit if there's more than 1k unpacked objects makes sense. Are fetches nowaways always using the "keep pack" and "fatten thin pack" semantics? If yes, then
cheers,
martin