Re: [PATCH] New files in git weren't being downloaded during CVS update
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 22, 2007, 07:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90701212302v458019fcxcde72a34aa46e7bd@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmz4bwzy4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 1/22/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > This is in response to Simon Schubert's suggestion that T_ADDED is an > > inappropriate category for a remotely added file. Instead this treats > > remotely added files the same as remotely changed files. > > Martin, I think this looks like a sane change.
It does -- sorry I've been offline for a few days and catching up with work.
> I do not have anything other than the real CVS running on a > Linux box to try this change (most notably I do not do Eclipse > nor Tortoise) myself and I am reluctant to touch things I cannot > personally test at this stage near the release.
Fair enough. I'll give it whirl later tonight. For a quick test, you can always
export CVS_SERVER=/home/martin/src/git/git-cvsserver.perl cvs update
> tested this for his own use in his environment, but I would > really appreciate a third party Ack from an environment > different from the originator of the patch.
Yup. Will test later tonight.
martin