Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.18.2
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2006, 01:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90611161744q6c535218n5b815ef1fc5228b6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061117004930.GC7201@pasky.or.cz>
On 11/17/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> * cg-log does not follow history across renames anymore; it never really > actually worked and was instead causing problems and random error > messages. There needs to be git-core support for this funcionality, > hacking it with a perl filter is bad design, so I'm not going to fix > the filter (but I'd take patches if someone else did ;).
I was looking at the follow renames Perl script last week (hey, I was bored!) and while I could tell it didn't work, I did get the feeling that it wasn't an impossible task, at least for the 'explicit paths' case. For the 'whole tree' and subpath cases it _is_ tricky, and would be faster to solve within git, but not impossible.
And even then, I am tempted to think that git log could provide some better hints than it does today when walking the whole tree or subpaths, so that cg-log or gitk can ask [if relevant] for selective rename info.
I am curious as to why you see it as bad design...
cheers,