Re: [PATCH] Introducing cg-xxdiff for conflict resolution
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2006, 02:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90611021841p54c38d72x12360ec93f32a8ad@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061103001135.GN20017@pasky.or.cz>
On 11/3/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Paski, did this one get dropped? Change of heart? Heart attack? > > Hmm, I thought we've agreed to go for the cg-resolve solution > instead...?
Oops. That wasn't my reading. Misunderstood. In any case, if you go back a bit in the conversation, the usage model I find this useful is one where it makes sense to try different tools that have entirely different parameters. That is why it makes sense to call them differently.
So cg-meld [meld params] , is different from cg-xxdiff [xxdiff params] and cg-wiggle [wiggle params] makes more sense to me and can be maintained by different people (those who like meld probably dont' use xxdiff ;-)
And from a packaging perspective, cg-resolve will depend on a zillion things.
cheers,