Re: [PATCH] Omit patches that have already been merged from format-patch output.

From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 12, 2005, 12:03 UTC
Message-ID: <46a038f9050912050367418617@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7voe6yik0o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On 9/12/05, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

> Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Strike that. PEBCAK: my branch entry was pointing to the wrong place. Sorry.
> 
> Thanks for quick correction.  Just from a curiosity, do you run
> GIT from the proposed updates branch?  I am asking because that
> suspect git-format-patch change is supposed to be only in there.

 
I'm running git on ~5 different machines. On the box where I do my
development, I have both 'master' and 'pu' checkouts, but mostly
master. Elsewhere, I track master, with updates every few days, when
my gut feeling is that things aren't too risky. On the servers (add ~4
servers to the list), I deploy only tagged versions, usually from the
Debian package.

And it was a total PEBCAK. I had just pulled in your latest merges to master and built/installed on a dev box, things were looking odd and I jumped the gun badly. As you point out, I didn't even have the patch in.

cheers,

martin