Re: Storing state in $GIT_DIR
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 26, 2005, 04:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90508252115415acc04@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508252051400.3317@g5.osdl.org>
On 8/26/05, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > OTOH, storing the metadata in a branch will allow us to run the import > > in alternating repositories. But as Junio points out, unless I can > > guarantee that the metadata and the tree are in sync, I cannot > > trivially resume the import cycle from a new repo. > > But you can. > > Remember: the metadata is the pointers to the original git conversion, and > objects are immutable. > > In other words, if you just have a "last commit" pointer in your > meta-data, then git is _by_definition_ in sync. There's never anything to > get out of sync, because objects aren't going to change.
Hmmm. That repo is in sync, but there are no guarantees that they will travel together to a different repo. In fact, the push/pull infrastructure wants to push/pull one head at a time.
And if they are not in sync, I have no way of knowing. Hmpf. I lie: the arch metadata could keep track of what it expects the last head commits to be, and complain bitterly if something smells rotten.
let me think about it ;)
martin