Re: FUNKY tags.
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 17, 2005, 00:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90508161755b43735c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050816224332.GE26455@redhat.com>
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according > to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which > are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier than the tag, > but are tagwise after. Spooky.
It's probably tags that were moved around with "cvs tag -F footag". When using cvs in with a dovetail strategy, people tend to merge BRANCH->HEAD and use a floating tag to mark how far it's been merged in.
I am somewhat worried about cvsps getting confused by these floating tags. Any help in teaching cvsps to ignore tags is welcome ;)
m