Re: Switching heads and head vs branch after CVS import
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 15, 2005, 20:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90508151309269ffc04@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508150930020.3553@g5.osdl.org>
On 8/16/05, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> The good news is that if you guess wrong, and you claim a merge where none > exists, it doesn't really do any real damage.
I had figured out what part of the code I wanted to hack, but was concerned that marking things that were merges in cvs-speak but not in git-speak would leave me with broken import and problems going forward.
If I find the time, I'll add some sort of pattern-match parameters to be tried against the commitmsg to extract likely head/branch names where we are merging from. My problem right now is that the only cvs repo with interesting branches and merges I have is huge, and takes an hour to import. That puts a damper on things, unfortunately.
cheers,
martin