Re: Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2005, 05:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f905050822413ece89b9@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <427EEB9E.9070701@zytor.com>
On 5/9/05, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> What would be the point? The reason for bkcvs was that bk wasn't > available to everyone.
Ease of transition for other automated tasks, perhaps? I don't know what bits and pieces of infrastructure hang from the old BK-CVS changeset distribution infrastructure.
Some projects do count on CVS gateways even if they use smarter SCMs. This is not just because of licensing issues -- sometimes portability and preexisting tools trump SCM changes.
regards,
martin