Re: git-svn and a nested branches folder

> Russ Brown <pickscrape@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Russ Brown <pickscrape@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> I'm having some trouble with using git-svn to fetch a repository, and I
>>>> think it's because the repository doesn't store branches as a flat list
>>>> directly under the 'branches' directory.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, we have a structure like this:
>>>>
>>>> |
>>>> +-trunk
>>>> +-tags
>>>> +-branches
>>>>   + category-a
>>>>     + branch-a
>>>>     + branch-b
>>>>   + category-b
>>>>     + branch-c
>>>>     + branch-d
>>>>
>>>> etc. category-a and category-b are simple directories created using svn
>>>> mkdir. The branches are created using svn cp.
>>>>
>>>> It helps us to organise the branches better, but the rationale is
>>>> besides the point. The problem is that git-svn seems to want to
>>>> treat category-a and category-b as branches, which isn't right at
>>>> all. As a result, git-svn seems to skip most (if not all) revisions
>>>> that occur in these directories and creates a lot of entries in
>>>> unhandled.log.
>>> So what did you specify in your .git/config file regarding the svn
>>> structure?
>> I specified the 'branches' directory, but that's because earlier in
>> the life of the repo we did just do the flat branch layout, but
>> decided to make it more structured once that got unwieldy.
> 
> Cough, cough.  _What_ did you specify in your .git/config file
> regarding the svn structure?  Please quote the section.
> 

>> Is it possible to specify more than one folder for the branches
>> option?
> 
> It is possible to adapt the config section to the actual layout.  If
> not otherwise, by starting with
> git svn init
> with a clean slate, editing the config file, and only then actually
> fetching stuff.
> 
> However, git-svn will not magically start guessing that you changed
> your structure around.  You have to edit the configuration
> appropriately.
>