Re: Rewriting history with git-filter-branch and leaking objects (?)
- From
Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2007, 02:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46C7AC3E.5010806@vilain.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070817174621.GA14503@glandium.org>
Mike Hommey wrote:
> Well, with the introduction of git-filter-branch, once you have > rewritten your history and validated that everything is okay, > you might mean to remove the original branch... >
Right, but it's probably better to leave a trail. I tend to use refs/Attic/* for branches that I've re-written (if I published them). That way, nothing will send or receive them by default. Sometimes I'll have a "clean" repository which doesn't have any of them for faster initial cloning.
Sam.