Re: How best to handle multiple-authorship commits in GIT?
- From
- David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Date
- Feb 3, 2012, 13:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4681.1328276820@redhat.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAD-XujkVK=tOtmVS90U0KAutFZ55jxsHMKuuMppXOi-H6ZY=RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Valerie Aurora <valerie.aurora@gmail.com> wrote:
> And for a complete (meaningful) rewrite such as David has done, he > changes the commit authorship and adds a Signed-off-by for the > original author.
Val[*] hasn't signed off all her patches, and indeed I've merged together some patches that she has signed off and some she hasn't. I can't simply add Signed-off-by her without her permission. However, if she's willing for me to add such lines, then I can do so.
> Signed-off-by: Some Upstream Author > Signed-off-by: Maintainer or Merger (rewrote error handling)
And if the changes are more than can be put in what's left of the line? I would've thought it would make more sense to do something like:
Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <valerie.aurora@gmail.com> (Original author) Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> (Further development)
David
[*] Apologies for talking about/to you in the third person, Val.