Re: git push over http is very dangerous

> Christian <crich-ml@beronet.com> writes:
>
>   
>> The central machine is a  AMD Sempron, it runs Debian Sarge (3.1)
>> We've installed git from source, because sarge has it not in its
>> archives.
>>
>> Maybe we did something wrong at building time ? or you're right and
>> the debian sarge zlib does not fit good to the current git versions ?
>>     
>
> What I have been suspecting since I got that not-corrupted but
> reported to be corrupt tree is that the version running on your
> "unable to fsck" machine -- the one you use as the central
> machine -- has a dud (or miscompiled) version of git, which
> somehow reports corruption incorrectly on perfectly good
> objects when it validates it before using them.
>   

> And to that machine, push over http succeeds fine only because
> push over http is "dangerous" in that it does not "validate" the
> pushed data on the receiving end like other codepaths do.
>
> It would be interesting to find out what the breakage is on that
> central machine.  I think enough people run Sarge that it is
> unlikely it's zlib at fault, but the way git uses the zlib API,
> which was cleaned up in the current tree with the two fixes from
> Linus I mentioned earlier.
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>