Re: git ls-files -o under .git/ prints all repository files
Show 6 quoted lines
>> okay, what do I expect when doing cd .git && git-ls-files?
>> Either listing *all files* in the repo (like git-ls-files from the
>> repo root) or no files at all, or failure (".git is private").
>
> List nothing. That's what it does. It could return non-0
> (which it does not), but aside from that,... looks very sensible.yah, to fail or not to fail. I'd still say listing in .git is invalid, hence fail.
> Alright, it is not. I can even imagine someone having a script
> containing "git-ls-files -o| rm -f; git reset --hard" to get clean
> working dir,
> and starting the script in .git one day. Make "-o" list nothing as well?
yes, I actually wanted to talk about -o, but forgot to mention. Following my reasoning above, it should fail as well.
cheers
simon
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>