Re: [PATCH] Add git-zip-tree to .gitignore
- From
Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
- Date
- Aug 27, 2006, 22:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <44F21E0B.9010600@lsrfire.ath.cx>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vlkp9x2b9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano schrieb:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Although it was my fault applying it already to "master" without
> asking this question first, I started to wonder how many more archive
> format people would want, and if it might make more sense to
> consolidate git-*-tree into a single frontend with an option to
> specify the archiver.
>
> We would obviously need to keep git-tar-tree as a backward
> compatibility alias for "git archive-tree -f tar", but doing things
> that way we do not have to introduce unbounded number of new
> git-{zip,rar,...}-tree programs.That thought occurred to me, too. I guess there are not that many more interesting archive formats, though. Can we defer adding git-archive-tree until a third archive format command appears? I won't submit another one, I promise. ;-)
René