Re: Does git belong in root's $PATH?

From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Jan 8, 2006, 00:37 UTC
Message-ID: <43C05ED5.1090603@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <43C02725.2020702@zytor.com>

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
>>
>> Not including /usr/local/{bin,sbin} in root's path is considered wise, 
>> since, historically, that's where users would install their own 
>> versions of programs that the system doesn't provide. This use has 
>> largely been obsoleted by $HOME/bin as the default for user-specific 
>> programs, mainly because of disks getting larger and cheaper.
>>
> 
> Hmmm... I think that was /usr/bin (hence the eventual migration of the 
> meaning of /usr from what was originally the equivalent of /home.)
>

I've been told that it's '/usr' simply because that's where user interface tools that have nothing to do with boot-strapping resides. A point emphasized by the fact that /bin, /sbin and /lib must not reside on network-mounted media, while /usr may.

It seems so logical I never bothered to look in to find out for myself though, so I may well be wrong, or at least younger. ;)

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231