Re: [PATCH] send-pack: reword non-fast-forward error message.

From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Dec 23, 2005, 12:13 UTC
Message-ID: <43ABE9FA.4010604@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <7vu0d0j24z.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 20 quoted lines

> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
> 
> 
>>Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes:
>>
>>
>>>Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>
>>>>In a sense, both are "pull first?" situation, and it probably is
>>>>more confusing to give different messages to the user in these
>>>>two cases.  From the end-user point of view they are the same
>>>>"remote is not strict subset.".
>>>
>>>In non-git'ish, does this mean "you're not up to date, so pull before 
>>>pushing" ? If so, why not say so? I'm sure it could prevent a fair few 
>>>problems for users (not least those new to scm's).
> 
> 
> That is reasonable.  How about this?
>

Me likes.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231