Re: git version
- From
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 15, 2005, 14:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <432985A7.5070900@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <u5tzmqeqw6z.fsf@lysator.liu.se>
David Kågedal wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Why is "git --version" called so, and not "git version"? It works > just like any other command, except that it is implemented internally > in the git script. > > The "git" command takes a subcommand that does some action or simply > prints some informational output. The "version" subcommand fits > nicely into that, and I don't see any need to prepend "--" to it. >
Consistency with other (non Git) commands was why I suggested the "--version" form when the discussion happened.