Re: Last mile to 1.0?
- From
- Kevin Smith <yarcs@qualitycode.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2005, 14:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <42E25874.2090201@qualitycode.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050723085031.GD3255@mythryan2.michonline.com>
Ryan Anderson wrote:
> Git falls into the category of distributed source code management tools, > similar to Arch or Darcs (or, in the commercial world, BitKeeper). This > means that every working directory is a full-fledged repository with > full revision tracking capabilities.
That's not actually what "distributed" means. There are several distributed SCM tools[1] that store repo information outside the actual working directory.
Perhaps that last sentence could be something like "This means that each developer has a local full-fledged repository with full revision tracking capabilities, not dependent on network access to a central server." I'm sure there are better wordings, but I hate to point out an problem without offering at least one possible improvement.
Kevin
[1] I believe that ArX, monotone, codeville, and svk all fall into this category. Possibly even Arch itself, although I haven't researched that.