Re: "git-send-pack"

From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2005, 21:26 UTC
Message-ID: <42C4639F.4040205@zytor.com>
In-Reply-To: <42C462CD.9010909@zytor.com>

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
>>
>>> For the purposes of rsync, storing the objects in a single 
>>> append-only file would be a very efficient method, since the rsync 
>>> algorithm will quickly discover an invariant head and only transmit 
>>> the tail.
>>
>>
>> Actually, it won't be "quick" - it will have to read the whole file 
>> and do it's hash window thing.
>>
> 
> It does that, but it only have to do that when the actual file has 
> changed.  That's acceptable, at least for the repository sizes we're 
> likely to deal with within the medium term.
>

I guess I should clarify a bit here. I'm concerned with two aspects: the "keeping mirrors in sync" problem, where asking people to use a tool other than rsync is a really tough sell, and the developer usage scenario, in which case something git-aware is obviously the better thing.

	-hpa