Re: checkout-cache -f: a better way?
- From
- Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 21, 2005, 01:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <428E92D1.80408@pobox.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505201841550.2206@ppc970.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> That's what, 20 times faster?
:)
> More, actually, I suspect, since the "-m" version is not only faster, but > it doesn't do much IO, so you'll not have tons of dirty pages/inodes etc > afterwards.
Yep. A -lot- of writeback would occur, a few seconds after my original script completed.
Jeff