Re: Yet another base64 patch
- From
- H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2005, 05:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <425E0174.4080404@zytor.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050414022413.GB18655@64m.dyndns.org>
Christopher Li wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:19:48PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>Checking out the total kernel tree (time checkout-cache -a into an empty >>directory): >> >> Cache cold Cache hot >>stock 3:46.95 19.95 >>base64 5:56.20 23.74 >>flat 2:44.13 15.68 > >>It seems that the flat format, at least on ext3 with dircache, is >>actually a major performance win, and that the second level loses quite >>a bit. > > That is not surprising due to the directory index in ext3. Htree is pretty > good at random access and the hashed file name distribute evenly, that is > the best case for htree. >
Right, so by not trying to do the filesystem's job for it we actually come out ahead.
-hpa