Re: [PATCH] Add --remotes option to show-branch
- From
Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
- Date
- Dec 19, 2006, 18:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4102F0A8-3DC4-43D1-B772-A4529D769131@silverinsanity.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpsagtowm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Actually, git show-branch origin/* would work equally well if > you do not have local "heads/origin/*" branches.
Fair enough. I'm not strongly attached to the options for the various refs. And there is always showbranch.default. I still think that --all would be good to keep around as meaning refs/heads/* and refs/remotes/*/*, however (and NOT refs/tags/*). If nothing else, so a small-ish repository can compare everything fairly easily.