git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git's database structure

From
RDReece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com>
Date
Sep 4, 2007, 19:44 UTC
Message-ID
<3f4fd2640709041244s125f5988j1c2d28f06bfbe098@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20070904180429.GA626@glandium.org>
On 04/09/07, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:44:47PM -0400, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The reason databases don't encode the fields into the index is that
> > you can only have a single index on the table if you do that.
> > Databases do sometimes duplicate the field in both the index and the
> > table. Databases also have the property that indexes are just a cache
> > and can be dropped at any time.
>
> The big difference between a database and git is that a database is a
> general purpose tool. git has a much more restricted scope. As such, it
> doesn't need *that much* flexibility.

Databases are designed to be efficient at storing and accessing large amounts of data. The key thing about a database is that it does not track the *history* of the data it is storing. This is the main problem with using a database as a metadata storage facility.

Modern source control systems such as Perforce (and possibly Subversion), use a database to track metadata such as branch/merge history, user data and so on. This, IMHO is a huge weakness of these SCM systems. It is impossible to fully roll back to a given point in time, because that metadata is stored independently of the file content tracking.

Git *is not a database*. This is fundamental to understanding how git works. Git stores *all* of its data in a Directed Acyclic Graph (with the exception of the pointers to tag and the current head of each branch, that it stores locally in the .git directory). Read http://eagain.net/articles/git-for-computer-scientists/ for more information on this.

What this means is that for any commit, git has all the information it needs about the repository at that point in time. It doesn't need anything else. If you then store information in a database, you lose having the complete picture at any point in the history of the repository.

- Reece
Previous: Mike HommeyNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 17 of 39 in “Git's database structure”
  1. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  2. Andreas EricssonSep 4, 2007
  3. Mike HommeySep 4, 2007
  4. Andreas EricssonSep 4, 2007
  5. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  6. Andreas EricssonSep 4, 2007
  7. Jeff KingSep 4, 2007
  8. David TweedSep 4, 2007
  9. Junio C HamanoSep 4, 2007
  10. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  11. Andreas EricssonSep 4, 2007
  12. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  13. Andreas EricssonSep 4, 2007
  14. Junio C HamanoSep 4, 2007
  15. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  16. Mike HommeySep 4, 2007
  17. Reece DunnSep 4, 2007
  18. Junio C HamanoSep 4, 2007
  19. Theodore TsoSep 4, 2007
  20. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  21. Andreas EricssonSep 5, 2007
  22. Jon SmirlSep 5, 2007
  23. Andreas EricssonSep 5, 2007
  24. Jon SmirlSep 5, 2007
  25. Julian PhillipsSep 5, 2007
  26. Jon SmirlSep 5, 2007
  27. Julian PhillipsSep 5, 2007
  28. Kyle MoffettSep 6, 2007
  29. Mike HommeySep 5, 2007
  30. Andreas EricssonSep 6, 2007
  31. Junio C HamanoSep 6, 2007
  32. Wincent ColaiutaSep 6, 2007
  33. Johannes SchindelinSep 6, 2007
  34. Steven GrimmSep 6, 2007
  35. Martin LanghoffSep 7, 2007
  36. Andy ParkinsSep 5, 2007
  37. Julian PhillipsSep 4, 2007
  38. Jon SmirlSep 4, 2007
  39. Andreas EricssonSep 4, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.