Re: git svn's performance on cloning mono's branches/tags...
- From
- Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2009, 03:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <3ace41890906272008t96bfb04q7218e95055897900@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <3ace41890906261817y523c9321xd621fb3130941d91@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Hin-Tak Leung<hintak.leung@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> the tags, branches, url entries are effectively the same, I think - so > the main difference is using trunk instead of fetch. > Why does it make any difference? The example at the bottom of > git-svn's man page uses the trunk notation. Maybe it should be > changed? >
To answer my question - I think the man page should be updated.
Also, while searching 'git svn speed', I found that a git clone of mono is available: http://www.mono-project.com/GitSVN A shame this page is not referenced my other devel resources on mono's web site at all... also it uses a real user's account to make the clone (rather than annonymous svn), so to update the git clone by git-svn, one needs a real dev account - that is not a problem for the purpose of sending in patches as the occasional dev.