git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

git-status too verbose?

From
EJEric Jaffe <jaffe.eric@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 4, 2006, 17:52 UTC
Message-ID
<38b80e980603040952j15152a21h2c903bd011d7e905@mail.gmail.com>
I was wondering if anyone else thinks that git-status should be more
like "git-diff --name-status". That is,
  # A a/newfile.c
  # M a/oldfile.c
instead of
  # new file: a/newfile.c
  # modified: a/oldfile.c
This would be similar to cg-status and "svn status", etc.

-- Eric Jaffe <jaffe.eric@gmail.com>

Next: Carl Worth
Message 1 of 12 in “git-status too verbose?”
  1. Eric JaffeMar 4, 2006
  2. Carl WorthMar 6, 2006
  3. Shawn PearceMar 6, 2006
  4. Junio C HamanoMar 7, 2006
  5. Joshua N PritikinMar 7, 2006
  6. Karl HasselströmMar 7, 2006
  7. Johannes SchindelinMar 7, 2006
  8. Andreas EricssonMar 7, 2006
  9. Junio C HamanoMar 7, 2006
  10. Andreas EricssonMar 7, 2006
  11. Linus TorvaldsMar 7, 2006
  12. Carl WorthMar 7, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.