git-status too verbose?
- From
- Eric Jaffe <jaffe.eric@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 4, 2006, 17:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <38b80e980603040952j15152a21h2c903bd011d7e905@mail.gmail.com>
I was wondering if anyone else thinks that git-status should be more like "git-diff --name-status". That is, # A a/newfile.c # M a/oldfile.c
instead of # new file: a/newfile.c # modified: a/oldfile.c
This would be similar to cg-status and "svn status", etc.
-- Eric Jaffe <jaffe.eric@gmail.com>