Re: git-core: conflictstyle=diff3 doesn't actually use diff3 compatible format
- From
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
- Date
- Mar 6, 2010, 12:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <36ca99e91003060457s6417f800uc7a3e126ee6b7d6f@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpr3itn89.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 23:31, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes: > >>> I can't live without conflictstyle=diff3m and I'm very happy it exists. >>> But it has a little problem: it uses "|||||||\n" as a separator for the >>> ancestor version of the text, whereas diff3 uses "||||||| <ancestorname>\n". >>> The difference is harmless for a human (tho the <ancestorname> can sometimes >>> be useful, assuming it's meaningful), but it makes some tools fail to >>> recognize the conflict markers properly. >>> So please add a " BASE" or " ANCESTOR" after the "|||||||". >> >> No opinion on this myself. I’d be interested to hear from xdiff people >> whether it should be easy to add the ancestor name to the output. > > I don't think there was any xdiff people involved in this area. > > I suspect that our tools actually rely on the common ancestor markers not > having any extra cruft after them, so it would be introducing a bug if you > change this output without changing the places that read them (I know > about "rerere", but there may be others).
rerere needs an isspace() after the specified marker length. So I assume it could live with extra cruft after the | marker and a space.
BTW: Am I right, that rerere would need to handle my new conflict style too?
Bert