Re: [PATCH 2/3] make union merge an xdl merge favor
- From
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
- Date
- Mar 1, 2010, 06:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <36ca99e91002282257i7f07f035o15d8d64e062ee94e@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwrxx2k29.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 21:15, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> writes: > >> The current union merge driver is implemented as an post process. But the >> xdl_merge code is quite capable to produce the result by itself. Therefore >> move to it there and teach git-merge-file a new --union option. > > I like the idea of patch 2 and 3 but they are independent of what we do > (or don't do) to merge-file. Could you flip the order of the patches so > that 2 and 3 can go first?
WIll do. On a side note: I plan to support the --union option also for git-checkout. Would that be a good idea?
Bert
> > >