Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] refs: implement partial reference transaction support

> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 25/02/2025 09:29, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>>> Git's reference transactions are all-or-nothing: either all updates
>>> succeed, or none do. While this atomic behavior is generally desirable,
>>> it can be suboptimal especially when using the reftable backend, where
>>> batching multiple reference updates into a single transaction is more
>>> efficient than performing them sequentially.
>>>
>>> Introduce partial transaction support with a new flag,
>>> 'REF_TRANSACTION_ALLOW_PARTIAL'. When enabled, this flag allows
>>> individual reference updates that would typically cause the entire
>>> transaction to fail due to non-system-related errors to be marked as
>>> rejected while permitting other updates to proceed. Non-system-related
>>> errors include issues caused by user-provided input values, whereas
>>> system-related errors, such as I/O failures or memory issues, continue
>>> to result in a full transaction failure. This approach enhances
>>> flexibility while preserving transactional integrity where necessary.
>>>
>>> The implementation introduces several key components:
>>>
>>>     - Add 'rejection_err' field to struct `ref_update` to track failed
>>>       updates with failure reason.
>>>
>>>     - Modify reference backends (files, packed, reftable) to handle
>>>       partial transactions by using `ref_transaction_set_rejected()`
>>>       instead of failing the entire transaction when
>>>       `REF_TRANSACTION_ALLOW_PARTIAL` is set.
>>>
>>>     - Add `ref_transaction_for_each_rejected_update()` to let callers
>>>       examine which updates were rejected and why.
>>
>> I think this is a much better design. I wonder if we want to signal to
>> the caller of ref_transaction_commit() that there were ignored errors
>> rather than forcing them to call ref_transaction_for_each_rejected() to
>> find that out. Another possibility would be to call the callback from
>> ref_transaction_commit() but that would mean changing the signature of
>> ref_transaction_begin() to take the callback and user data when
>> REF_TRANSACTION_ALLOW_PARTIAL is passed.
>>
> 
> Yes, I did toy around modifying `ref_transaction_*` at first, but I
> think the current implementation is slightly better. Users of the ref
> API do not have to worry about complexity of partial transactions unless
> they really need to. So in that case, for most users, the API remains
> simple and clean, and for specific users who do want partial transaction
> support, they can activate it via the flag and use the iterator to
> collect the rejections at the end.