Re: [RFC] Hidden refs
Show 7 quoted lines
> So I'm wondering if it makes sense to properly support hidden
> directories in
> refs/, and what it would take to do so. (I image, for example, that
> things
> would behave quite differently on Windows...)
>
> Thoughts?
We currently use refs/hidden/heads and refs/hidden/tags for hidden refs. It does require calling 'gitk --branches --tags' rather than 'gitk --all', but otherwise I like the behavior (git branch only lists refs/heads, git tag only lists ref/tags). And they never get cloned by default (they can still be fetched when needed).
Stephen