Re: Pseudonymous commits
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 25, 2010, 05:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <32541b131003242214o2b05e5cbn1668872daea7e887@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4BAAEDF7.1080107@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Mike.lifeguard <mike.lifeguard@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On 10-03-25 01:54 AM, Kris Shannon wrote: >> Accountability for translations is even more important because review is >> usually a LOT harder. > > I didn't say the translations weren't reviewed, or the translators were > unaccountable. They are in both cases.
I think the point is that if you don't even have contact information for them, they can't *really* be accountable. But of course that's up to you.
> In any case, is the answer "git can't do that" or not? Because that's > actually the answer I'm interested in.
Every committer (and author) in git has a (nonempty, I think) name and an email address, and that's how you identify the committer (and author). What you do with those fields is between you and your project maintainer.
Have fun,
Avery