Re: [PATCH] Fix overridable written with an extra 'e'
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2009, 15:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <32541b130908280815y78f95140re679c336fbd17443@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v63c8a69a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Hmph, I don't know. Googling "overrideable" suggests "Did you mean > overridable?" which is enough clue for me.
Using a similar system, the Google hit count:
overrideable: 26,900 overridable: 339,000 overridden: 2,280,000
Which agrees with my intuition that you can get away with overridable, but it's much more common to just use overridden.
"override" of course comes from "ride" (181,000,000). A horse can be ridden (10,500,000) if it's ridable (82,500).
The bad news: rideable (201,000).
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ridable shows rideable as the preferred spelling, but accepts both.
Have fun,
Avery