Re: Dividing up a large merge.
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 15, 2009, 00:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <32541b130907141734o59d224i7e0f39aa8a85e8ef@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090715002926.GA26630@huya.quicinc.com>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:29 PM, <davidb@quicinc.com> wrote:
> The real issue is that there isn't any single individual who > understands all of the code that conflicts. It has to be divided > up somehow, I'm just trying to figure out a better way of doing > it.
How about having one person do the merge, then commit it (including conflict markers), then have other people just make a series of commits removing the conflict markers?
Avery