Re: git pull bug report
On 15/11/21 15.42, Erwin Villejo wrote:
Show 47 quoted lines
>> What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue)
> * make local changes, stage, and commit
> * local is ahead of upstream. confirmed by `git status`:
>
> ```
> $ git status
> On branch main
> Your branch is ahead of 'github/main' by 1 commit.
> (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
> ```
>
> * try to pull upstream to local
>
>> What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)
> No-op (and NO failure) since local is ahead of upstream.
>
>> What happened instead? (Actual behavior)
> `git pull` fails with error:
>
> ```
> $ git pull
> hint: You have divergent branches and need to specify how to reconcile them.
> hint: You can do so by running one of the following commands sometime before
> hint: your next pull:
> hint:
> hint: git config pull.rebase false # merge (the default strategy)
> hint: git config pull.rebase true # rebase
> hint: git config pull.ff only # fast-forward only
> hint:
> hint: You can replace "git config" with "git config --global" to set a default
> hint: preference for all repositories. You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase,
> hint: or --ff-only on the command line to override the configured default per
> hint: invocation.
> fatal: Need to specify how to reconcile divergent branches.
> ```
>
>> What's different between what you expected and what actually happened?
> I expected no failure and no-op since local is ahead of upstream.
> Instead, `git pull`
> fails because it thinks the branches have diverged.
>
>> Anything else you want to add:
> I found this bug in VSCode. VSCode runs `git pull` first before `git
> push` when pushing to upstream.
> This bug causes pushing via VSCode to always fail, although it can be
> worked around by simply opening
> a terminal and running `git push` manually.
You need to do the prompt above, so not a bug.
When reconciling, do you want merge or rebase?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara